Feasibility of using an automated call service to collect quality of life and functional outcome data in trauma patients.

Objectives: Following up trauma patients after discharge, to evaluate their subsequent quality of life and functional outcomes, is notoriously difficult, time consuming, and expensive. Automated systems are a conceptually attractive solution. We prospectively assessed the feasibility of using a series of automated phone calls administered by Emmi Patient Engagement to survey trauma patients after discharge. Methods: Recruitment into the study was incorporated into the patient discharge process by nursing staff. For this pilot, we included trauma patients discharging home and who were able to answer phone calls. A script was created to evaluate the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale and the EuroQol EQ-5D to assess functional status and quality of life, respectively. Call attempts were made at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after discharge. Results: A total of 110 patients initially agreed to participate. 368 attempted patient encounters (calls or attempted calls) took place, with 104 (28.3%) patients answering a least one question in the study. 21 unique patients (19.1% of those enrolled) completed 27 surveys. Conclusions: Automated, scripted phone calls to survey patients after discharge are not a feasible way of collecting functional and quality of life data. Level of evidence: Level II/prospective.

Prospective randomized pilot trial comparing prophylactic vs therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid drainage during complex endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular techniques have transformed the management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). However, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains a prevalent and devastating complication. Prophylactic drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is among the proposed strategies for prevention of SCI. Although prophylactic CSF drainage is widely used and conceptually attractive, prophylactic CSF drains have not been demonstrated to definitively prevent the occurrence nor mitigate the severity of SCI in endovascular TAAA repair. Whether or not outcomes of prophylactic drains are superior to therapeutic drains remains unknown. This pilot study was performed to determine the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial designed to investigate the role of prophylactic vs therapeutic CSF drains in the prevention of SCI in patients undergoing endovascular TAAA repair using branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FBEVAR). METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter randomized pilot clinical trial conducted at The University of Alabama at Birmingham and The University of Massachusetts. Twenty patients were enrolled and randomized to either the prophylactic drainage or therapeutic drainage groups, prior to undergoing FBEVAR for extensive TAAAs and arch aortic aneurysms. This was a pilot feasibility study that was not powered to detect statistical differences in clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was feasibility of randomization and compliance with a shared lumbar drain protocol. Secondary outcomes included rate of drain complications and SCI. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled and successfully randomized, without any crossovers, to either the control cohort (n = 10), without prophylactic drains, or the experimental cohort (n = 10), with prophylactic drains. There were no differences in age, comorbidities, or history of prior aortic surgery across the cohorts. All patients were treated with FBEVAR. Aneurysm classifications were as follows: Extent I (10%), Extent II (50%), Extent III (35%), and Extent IV (5%). The average length of aortic coverage was 207 ± 21.6 mm. The length of aortic coverage did not vary across cohorts, nor did procedural times or blood loss volume. Compliance with the SCI prevention protocol was 100% across both groups. Within the prophylactic drain cohort, one patient experienced an adverse event related to lumbar drain placement, manifested as an epidural hematoma requiring laminectomy, without neurologic deficit (n = 1/10; 10%). There was one SCI event (n = 1/20; 5%), which occurred in the prophylactic drain cohort on postoperative day 9 following an episode of hypotension related to a gastrointestinal bleed. CONCLUSIONS: The role of prophylactic CSF drains for the prevention of SCI following endovascular TAAA repair is a topic of ongoing research, with many current practices based on expert opinion and experience, rather than rigorous scientific data. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a multicenter randomized clinical trial to evaluate the role of prophylactic vs therapeutic CSF drains in the prevention of SCI in patients undergoing endovascular TAAA repair.

Changes in neurologic status after traumatic brain injury in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Hypertonic Saline trial.

Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important public health problem resulting in significant death and disability. Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel often provide initial treatment for TBI, but only limited data describe the long-term course and outcomes of this care. We sought to characterize changes in neurologic status among adults with TBI patients enrolled in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Hypertonic Saline (ROC-HS) trial. Methods: We used data from the TBI cohort of the ROC-HS trial. The trial included adults with TBI, with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8, and excluded those with shock (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≤70 or SBP 71-90 with a heart rate [HR] ≥108). The primary outcome was Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E; 1 = dead, 8 = no disability) determined at (a) hospital discharge and (b) 6-month follow-up. We assessed changes in GOS-E between hospital discharge and 6-month follow-up using descriptive statistics and Sankey graphs. Results: Among 1279 TBI included in the analysis, GOS-E categories at hospital discharge were as follows: favorable (GOS-E 5-8) 220 (17.2%), unfavorable (GOS-E 2-4) 664 (51.9%), dead (GOS-E 1) 321 (25.1%), and missing 74 (5.8%). GOS-E categories at 6-month follow-up were as follows: favorable 459 (35.9%), unfavorable 279 (21.8%), dead 346 (27.1%), and missing 195 (15.2%). Among initial TBI survivors with complete GOS-E, >96% followed one of three neurologic recovery patterns: (1) favorable to favorable (20.0%), (2) unfavorable to favorable (40.3%), and (3) unfavorable to unfavorable (36.0%). Few patients deteriorated from favorable to unfavorable neurologic status, and there were few additional deaths. Conclusions: Among TBI receiving initial prehospital care in the ROC-HS trial, changes in 6-month neurologic status followed distinct patterns. Among TBI with unfavorable neurologic status at hospital discharge, almost half improved to favorable neurologic status at 6 months. Among those with favorable neurologic status at discharge, very few worsened or died at 6 months. These findings have important implications for TBI clinical care, research, and trial design.

Developing the Ready Military Medical Force: military-specific training in Graduate Medical Education.

Introduction: Graduate Medical Education plays a critical role in training the next generation of military physicians, ensuring they are ready to uphold the dual professional requirements inherent to being both a military officer and a military physician. This involves executing the operational duties as a commissioned leader while also providing exceptional medical care in austere environments and in harm's way. The purpose of this study is to review prior efforts at developing and implementing military unique curricula (MUC) in residency training programs. Methods: We performed a literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, and the Defense Technical Information Center through August 8, 2023, including terms "graduate medical education" and "military." We included articles if they specifically addressed military curricula in residency with terms including "residency and operational" or "readiness training", "military program", or "military curriculum". Results: We identified 1455 articles based on title and abstract initially and fully reviewed 111. We determined that 64 articles met our inclusion criteria by describing the history or context of MUC, surveys supporting MUC, or military programs or curricula incorporated into residency training or military-specific residency programs. Conclusion: We found that although there have been multiple attempts at establishing MUC across training programs, it is difficult to create a uniform curriculum that can be implemented to train residents to a single standard across services and specialties.

Outcomes of Patients Enrolled in a Prospective and Randomized Trial on Basis of Gestalt Assessment or ABC Score.

INTRODUCTION: The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial rapidly enrolled patients based on an ABC ≥ 2 score, or Physician Gestalt (PG) when ABC score was <2. The objective of this study was to describe what patients were enrolled by the two methods and whether patient outcomes differed based these enrollments. We hypothesized that there would be no differences in outcomes based on whether patients were enrolled via ABC score or PG. METHODS: Patients were enrolled with an ABC ≥ 2 or by PG when ABC was <2 by the attending trauma surgeon. We compared 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-hour mortality, 30-day mortality, time to hemostasis, emergent surgical or interventional radiology procedure and the proportion of patients who required either >10 units of blood in 24 hours or > 3 units in one hour. RESULTS: Of 680 patients, 438 (64%) were enrolled on the basis of an ABC score ≥ 2 and 242 (36% by PG when the ABC score was <2. Patients enrolled by PG were older (median 44, IQR 28-59, p < 0.001), more likely to be white (70.3% vs 60.3%, p = 0.014), and more likely to have been injured by blunt mechanisms (77.3% vs 37.2%, p < 0.001). They were also less hypotensive and less tachycardic than patients enrolled by ABC score (both p < 0.001). The groups had similar Injury Severity Scores in the ABC ≥ 2 and PG groups (26 and 27 respectively) and were equally represented (49.1% and 50.8% respectively) in the 1:1:1 treatment arm. There were no significant differences between the ABC score and PG groups for mortality at any point. Time to hemostasis (108 for patients enrolled on basis of Gestalt, vs. 100 mins for patients enrolled on basis of ABC score), and the proportion of patients requiring a massive transfusion (>10 units/24 h) (44.2% vs. 47.3%), or meeting the critical administration threshold (>3 unit/1 hr) (84.7% vs. 89.5%) were similar (p = 0.071). CONCLUSION: Early identification of trauma patients likely to require a massive transfusion is important for clinical care, resource use, and selection of patients for clinical trials. Patients enrolled in the PROPPR trial based on PG when the ABC score was <2 represented 36% of the patients and had identical outcomes to those enrolled on the basis of an ABC score of ≥2. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Prognostic.

Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Trauma Patients With Exsanguinating Hemorrhage: The UK-REBOA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Bleeding is the most common cause of preventable death after trauma. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) when used in the emergency department along with standard care vs standard care alone on mortality in trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, bayesian, randomized clinical trial conducted at 16 major trauma centers in the UK. Patients aged 16 years or older with exsanguinating hemorrhage were enrolled between October 2017 and March 2022 and followed up for 90 days. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) to a strategy that included REBOA and standard care (n = 46) or standard care alone (n = 44). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Ten secondary outcomes included mortality at 6 months, while in the hospital, and within 24 hours, 6 hours, or 3 hours; the need for definitive hemorrhage control procedures; time to commencement of definitive hemorrhage control procedures; complications; length of stay; blood product use; and cause of death. Results: Of the 90 patients (median age, 41 years [IQR, 31-59 years]; 62 [69%] were male; and the median Injury Severity Score was 41 [IQR, 29-50]) randomized, 89 were included in the primary outcome analysis because 1 patient in the standard care alone group declined to provide consent for continued participation and data collection 4 days after enrollment. At 90 days, 25 of 46 patients (54%) had experienced all-cause mortality in the REBOA and standard care group vs 18 of 43 patients (42%) in the standard care alone group (odds ratio [OR], 1.58 [95% credible interval, 0.72-3.52]; posterior probability of an OR >1 [indicating increased odds of death with REBOA], 86.9%). Among the 10 secondary outcomes, the ORs for mortality and the posterior probabilities of an OR greater than 1 for 6-month, in-hospital, and 24-, 6-, or 3-hour mortality were all increased in the REBOA and standard care group, and the ORs were increased with earlier mortality end points. There were more deaths due to bleeding in the REBOA and standard care group (8 of 25 patients [32%]) than in standard care alone group (3 of 18 patients [17%]), and most occurred within 24 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: In trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage, a strategy of REBOA and standard care in the emergency department does not reduce, and may increase, mortality compared with standard care alone. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16184981.

Pain in Trauma Patients: Measurement and Predisposing Factors.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pain is common after injury. This study intended to evaluate the feasibility of quantifying pain experience over an entire admission using "area under the pain curve" and to identify factors associated with increased pain. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all trauma patients admitted from 2013 to 2020. Maximum pain scores were extracted for each day. Pain was defined as area under the curve (AUC) of maximum pain scores/day plotted against time. Injury patterns were analyzed by dichotomizing Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores (AIS < 3 versus AIS ≥ 3) for each body region. Urinary drug screen results were collected from admission data. A general linear model was used to determine which injury patterns, mechanisms, and age groups were predictive of increased AUC in all patients together and separate by operative and nonoperative groups. RESULTS: We identified 21,640 patients, of which 70% were male and 83% had suffered blunt injury. Overall injury severity was associated with increased pain experience. Serious head injury, younger age, and older age (compared to 45-49 y) were associated with decreased pain. Spinal injuries, thoraco-abdominal injuries, and combined thoracic and lower extremity injuries were predictive of increased pain. Compared to patients with no positive test for illicit substances or documentation of prehospital narcotic medications, the pain experience was greater for both, those who had been administered a narcotic in the prehospital setting and those who tested positive for illicit substances. CONCLUSIONS: This study extends the concept of total pain experience using AUC methodology. Our results demonstrate associations between increased pain and certain patterns of injury, ages, and presence of drugs on admission. Measuring total pain experience could assist in comparing pain-management strategies. Future research should focus on validating pain experience against quality-of-life measurements.

Surgeon perspectives on the STITCH trial: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia prevention strategies related to fascial closure technique during laparotomy are well described yet poorly implemented in practice. The factors hindering the surgeon's adoption of evidence-based techniques for fascial closure are poorly understood and characterized. METHODS: Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design, we first collected 139 responses to a validated quantitative survey based on a Theoretical Domain Framework for adoption of healthcare practices. Mean scores from survey responses were tabulated, and the findings were used to develop an interview guide for subsequent qualitative individual semi-structured phone interviews. Fourteen practicing surgeons were purposively sampled from social media outlets and our institution. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for coding and thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Plus. Data from the surveys and interviews were integrated using joint displays. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analyses from surveys and semi-structured interviews revealed various themes related to surgeon decision-making related to fascial closure technique. Surgeons cited limitations of prior studies, applicability of findings, anecdotal experiences, and situation-specific environments that influence their decision-making. Peer influence and lack of training also affected surgeons' perspectives on integrating small bite technique into practice. CONCLUSION: Trial design limitations, peer influence, and patient-specific factors impacted surgeon decision-making in the choice of fascial closure technique. Future clinical trials in diverse patient populations may improve surgeons' confidence in implementing technique for fascial closure.

The 16-year evolution of a military-civilian partnership: The University of Alabama at Birmingham experience.

BACKGROUND: At the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), a multi-tiered military-civilian partnership (MCP) has evolved since 2006. We aimed to outline this model to facilitate potential replication nationally. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive review of the partnership between UAB, the United States Air Force Special Operations Command, and the Department of Defense (DoD) reviewing key documents and conducting interviews with providers. As a purely descriptive study, this project did not involve any patient data acquisition or analysis and therefore was exempt from institutional review board approval per institutional policy. RESULTS: At the time of this review, six core programs existed targeting training, clinical proficiency, and research. Training: (1) The Special Operations Center for Medical Integration and Development trains up to 144 combat medics yearly. (2) UAB trains one integrated military Surgery resident yearly with two additional civilian-sponsored military residents in Emergency Medicine. (3) UAB's Surgical Critical Care Fellowship had one National Guard member with two incoming Active-Duty, one Reservist and one prior service member in August 2022. Clinical Proficiency: (4) UAB hosts four permanently assigned United States Air Force Special Operations Command Special Operations Surgical Teams composed of general surgeons, anesthesiologists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, surgical technologists, emergency physicians, critical care registered nurses, and respiratory therapists totaling 24 permanently assigned active-duty health care professionals. (5) In addition, two fellowship-trained Air Force Trauma Critical Care Surgeons, one Active-Duty and one Reservist, are permanently assigned to UAB. These clinicians participate fully and independently in the routine care of patients alongside their civilian counterparts. Research: (6) UAB's Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery is currently conducting nine DoD-funded research projects totaling $6,482,790, and four research projects with military relevance funded by other agencies totaling $15,357,191. CONCLUSION: The collaboration between UAB and various elements within the DoD illustrates a comprehensive approach to MCP. Replicating appropriate components of this model nationally may aid in the development of a truly integrated trauma system best prepared for the challenges of the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Value-based Evaluations; Level IV.

The females have spoken: A patient-centered national survey on the administration of emergent transfusions with the potential for future fetal harm.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death. Early in the resuscitation, only RhD-positive red blood cells are likely to be available, which poses a small risk of causing harm to a future fetus if transfused to an RhD-negative females of childbearing age (CBA), that is, 15 to 49 years old. We sought to characterize how the population, in particular females of CBA, felt about emergency blood administration vis-a-vis potential future fetal harm. METHODS: A national survey was performed using Facebook advertisements in three waves from January 2021 to January 2022. The advertisements directed users to the survey site with seven demographic questions and four questions on accepting transfusion with differing probabilities for future fetal harm (none/any/1:100/1:10,000). Acceptance of transfusion questions were scored on 3-point Likert scale (likely/neutral/unlikely). Only completed responses by females were analyzed. RESULTS: Advertisements were viewed 16,600,430 times by 2,169,805 people with 15,396 advertisement clicks and 2,873 surveys initiated. Most (2,256 of 2,873 [79%]) were fully completed. Majority (2,049 of 2,256 [90%]) of respondents were female. Eighty percent of females (1,645 of 2,049) were of CBA. Most females responded "likely" or "neutral" when asked whether they would accept a lifesaving transfusion if the following risk of fetal harm were present: no risk (99%), any risk (83%), 1:100 risk (85%), and 1:10,000 risk (92%). There were no differences between females of CBA versus non-CBA with respect to the likelihood of accepting lifesaving transfusion with any potential for future fetal harm ( p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: This national survey suggests that most females would accept lifesaving transfusion even with the potential low risk of future fetal harm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Use of Bayesian Statistics to Reanalyze Data From the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios Trial.

Importance: Frequentist statistical approaches are the most common strategies for clinical trial design; however, bayesian trial design may provide a more optimal study technique for trauma-related studies. Objective: To describe the outcomes of bayesian statistical approaches using data from the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study performed a post hoc bayesian analysis of the PROPPR Trial using multiple hierarchical models to assess the association of resuscitation strategy with mortality. The PROPPR Trial took place at 12 US level I trauma centers from August 2012 to December 2013. A total of 680 severely injured trauma patients who were anticipated to require large volume transfusions were included in the study. Data analysis for this quality improvement study was conducted from December 2021 and June 2022. Interventions: In the PROPPR Trial, patients were randomized to receive a balanced transfusion (equal portions of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells [1:1:1]) vs a red blood cell-heavy strategy (1:1:2) during their initial resuscitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes from the PROPPR trial included 24-hour and 30-day all-cause mortality using frequentist statistical methods. Bayesian methods were used to define the posterior probabilities associated with the resuscitation strategies at each of the original primary end points. Results: Overall, 680 patients (546 [80.3%] male; median [IQR] age, 34 [24-51] years, 330 [48.5%] with penetrating injury; median [IQR] Injury Severity Score, 26 [17-41]; 591 [87.0%] with severe hemorrhage) were included in the original PROPPR Trial. Between the groups, no significant differences in mortality were originally detected at 24 hours (12.7% vs 17.0%; adjusted risk ratio [RR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.52-1.08]; P = .12) or 30 days (22.4% vs 26.1%; adjusted RR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.65-1.12]; P = .26). Using bayesian approaches, a 1:1:1 resuscitation was found to have a 93% (Bayes factor, 13.7; RR, 0.75 [95% credible interval, 0.45-1.11]) and 87% (Bayes factor, 6.56; RR, 0.82 [95% credible interval, 0.57-1.16]) probability of being superior to a 1:1:2 resuscitation with regards to 24-hour and 30-day mortality, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this quality improvement study, a post hoc bayesian analysis of the PROPPR Trial found evidence in support of mortality reduction with a balanced resuscitation strategy for patients in hemorrhagic shock. Bayesian statistical methods offer probability-based results capable of direct comparison between various interventions and should be considered for future studies assessing trauma-related outcomes.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Prehospital Tourniquet Use for Trauma in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The use of the extremity tourniquet in military environments has reduced preventable deaths due to exsanguinating hemorrhage, leading to increased use in civilian settings. However, the outcomes of contemporary prehospital tourniquet use in civilian settings are not well-described nationally. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes following prehospital tourniquet use by emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States. METHODS: All trauma activations reported to the National EMS Information System 2019 (NEMSIS) were included. Patients who had ≥1 tourniquet applied were identified. Descriptive analyses were used to compare characteristics between tourniquet and no-tourniquet cohorts. Coarsened exact matching was performed to generate a k2k match (on age, sex, lowest-systolic blood pressure, initial patient acuity, provider's initial impression, injury mechanism, and presence of upper/lower extremity injuries) and used to compare outcomes. Trauma patients who may have potentially benefited from tourniquet application (extremity injury, shock index ≥1 and no documented tourniquet application) were identified. RESULTS: A total of 7,161 tourniquets were applied among 4,571,379 trauma activations (1.6/1000 activations). Patients in the tourniquet cohort were younger (40 ± 18 vs 52 ± 26 mean ± SD years), more hypotensive (16.1% vs. 2.5%) and had higher initial acuity (65.0% critical/emergent vs. 20.6%) [p < 0.01 for all]. A total of 7,074 patients in the tourniquet cohort were matched with 7,074 patients in the non-tourniquet cohort. Post-match analysis revealed that the patients in tourniquet cohort had a higher final acuity (80.8% vs. 75.0%, p < 0.01), lower scene-time (15.4 ± 13.6 vs. 17.0 ± 14.2 mean ± SD minutes, p < 0.01), and higher survival-to-hospital (83.6% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.01). A total of 141,471 trauma patients who may have potentially benefited from tourniquet application were identified. CONCLUSION: Prehospital tourniquet use by EMS in the United States is associated with lower scene-time and improved survivability to hospital. Results indicate that patients might benefit from wider tourniquet use in the civilian prehospital setting.

Over-transfusion with blood for suspected hemorrhagic shock is not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated patient outcomes after early, small volume red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the setting of presumed hemorrhagic shock. We hypothesized that transfusion with even small amounts of blood would be associated with more complications. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective review of trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021. Patients predicted to require massive transfusion who survived ≥72 h were categorized according to units of RBCs transfused in the first 24 h. A Cox regression model stratified by dichotomized ISS and adjusted for SBP <90 mm Hg and pulse >120 bpm on arrival was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 3121 (24%) received RBC transfusion within the first 24 h. Massive transfusion protocol (MTP) was activated in 38% (1188/3121): 17% received no RBCs, 27.4% 1-3 units, 32.4% 4-9 units, and 22.7% ≥10 units. Mean ISS increased with each category of RBC transfusion. There was no difference in the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), infection, cardiac arrest, venous thromboembolism or stroke for patients receiving 1-3 units compared to the non-transfused group or 4-9 units group (p > 0.05). Compared to those receiving ≥10 units, the 1-3 units group had a significantly lower risk of AKI, ARDS, and cardiac arrest. DISCUSSION: Early empiric RBC transfusion for presumed hemorrhagic shock may subject patients to potential over-transfusion and end-organ damage. Among patients meeting clinical triggers for MTP, 1-3 units of allogeneic RBCs is not associated with worse outcomes.

Nationwide estimates of the need for prehospital blood products after injury.

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital blood product resuscitation after injury significantly decreases risk of mortality. However, the number of patients who may potentially benefit from this life-saving intervention is currently unknown. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the number of patients who may potentially benefit from prehospital blood product resuscitation after injury in the United States. The secondary objective was to estimate the amount of blood products needed for prehospital resuscitation of injured patients. METHODS: Patients ≥16 years with blunt/penetrating injuries included in National Emergency Medical Services Information System 2019 were identified and classified into four separate cohorts of hemodynamic instability: Cohort 1 (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <90 mmHg), Cohort 2 (SBP <90 and/or heart rate [HR] >120), Cohort 3 (SBP <90 and HR >108 or SBP <70), and Cohort 4 (shock index ≥1). The need for prehospital blood was estimated by multiplying number of patients in each cohort with average number of blood products used for prehospital resuscitation. RESULTS: After exclusions, 3.7 million adult trauma patients were included. The number of patients who may potentially benefit from prehospital blood products was estimated as 89,391 (Cohort 1), 901,346 (Cohort 2), 54,160 (Cohort 3), and 300,475 (Cohort 4). Assuming 1 unit of whole blood is needed per patient, a lower-bound estimate of 54,160 additional whole blood units (0.6% of current collections) will be need for prehospital resuscitation of the injured. CONCLUSIONS: Annually, between 54,000 and 900,000 patients may potentially benefit from prehospital blood product resuscitation after injury in the United States. Prehospital blood utilization and collection of blood products will need to be increased to scale-up this life-saving intervention nationwide.

Endotheliopathy is Associated with a 24-hour Fibrinolysis Phenotype Described by Low TEG Lysis and High D-Dimer after Trauma: a Secondary Analysis of the PROPPR Study.

Objectives: Determine associations between biomarkers of endotheliopathy, 24-hour fibrinolysis phenotypes and clinical outcomes after trauma. Background: The vascular endothelium is a critical regulator of hemostasis and organ function. The relationship between markers of endotheliopathy and fibrinolysis following trauma has not been evaluated. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected biomarker data in the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) randomized controlled trial. We stratified subjects by 24-hour thromboelastography (TEG) percent clot lysis (LY30) and plasma D-dimer (DD) levels and evaluated differences in endotheliopathy biomarkers and clinical outcomes between subjects with one of four 24-hour fibrinolysis phenotypes: LY30 0.9-2.9% (LY30norm), LY30 >2.9% (LY30high), LY30 <0.9% and low DD (LY30low+DDlow), and LY30 <0.9% and high DD (LY30low+DDhigh). Results: The analysis included 168 subjects with LY30norm, 32 with LY30high, 147 with LY30low+DDlow and 124 with LY30low+DDhigh. LY30low+DDhigh subjects had greater injury severity and a higher incidence of severe head injury, multiorgan failure (MOF), and mortality than the other phenotypes. All endotheliopathy biomarkers were significantly higher in the LY30low+DDhigh phenotype. Adjusting for injury severity, mechanism and head trauma, 24-hour angiopoietin-2 and soluble thrombomodulin were independently associated with the LY30low+DDhigh phenotype. Both endothelial biomarkers were discriminating for MOF. Subjects with thrombomodulin level >9.5 ng/mL and angiopoietin-2 level >3.6 ng/mL accounted for 64% of subjects who developed MOF. Conclusions: In a multicenter trauma cohort, subjects with a fibrinolysis phenotype characterized by low TEG lysis and elevated DD 24 hours after injury have significantly worse endotheliopathy and clinical outcomes. Our findings support mechanistic evaluations of the role of the endothelium in fibrinolysis dysregulation that may drive late-stage organ injury.

Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials comprise multiple processes at various stages of the trial lifecycle. These processes often involve complex behaviours such as recruiting vulnerable patient populations and clinicians having to deliver complex trial interventions successfully. Few studies have utilised a behavioural framework to assess challenges and develop strategies for effective trial recruitment and delivery of trial interventions. This study reports the application of an innovative methodological approach to understand core trial processes, namely recruitment and intervention delivery, using a behavioural science approach to develop strategies designed to mitigate trial process problems. METHODS: The UK-REBOA trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (a novel intervention) in injured patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage. A behavioural investigation ('diagnosis') was conducted using theory-informed (Theoretical Domains Framework, TDF) semi-structured interviews with site staff from the UK-REBOA trial to examine trial processes which could be improved in relation to trial recruitment and delivery of the intervention. Interviews were analysed using the TDF to identify influences on behaviour, which were then mapped to techniques for behaviour change and developed into potential solutions. RESULTS: The behavioural diagnosis of the challenges experienced during trial processes highlighted factors relevant to a range of TDF domains: Skills, Environmental context and resources, Beliefs about capabilities, Beliefs about consequences, Social influences, and Memory, attention, and decision-making processes. Within the solution development phase, we identified 24 suitable behaviour change techniques that were developed into proposed solutions to target reported process problems with the aim of changing behaviour to improve recruitment and/or intervention delivery. Proposed solutions included targeted changes to trial training content, suggestions to restructure the environment (e.g. reinforced the purpose of the trial with information about the social and environmental consequences) and other strategies to reduce barriers to recruitment and intervention delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a behavioural approach to investigate ('diagnose') behavioural trial process problems and subsequently develop and implement targeted solutions ('treatment') in an active trauma trial. Understanding the factors that affected behaviour, attitudes and beliefs in this trauma trial allowed us to implement theoretically informed, evidence-based solutions designed to enhance trial practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 16,184,981.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for trauma patients with uncontrolled torso haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial (the UK-REBOA trial).

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhage is the most common cause of preventable death after injury. REBOA is a novel technique whereby a percutaneously inserted balloon is deployed in the aorta, providing a relatively quick means of temporarily controlling haemorrhage and augmenting cerebral and coronary perfusion, until definitive control of haemorrhage can be attained. The aim of the UK-REBOA trial is to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a policy of standard major trauma centre treatment plus REBOA, as compared with standard major trauma centre treatment alone, for the management of uncontrolled torso haemorrhage caused by injury. METHODS: Pragmatic, Bayesian, group-sequential, randomised controlled trial, performed in 16 major trauma centres in England. We aim to randomise 120 injured patients with suspected exsanguinating haemorrhage to either standard major trauma centre care plus REBOA or standard major trauma centre care alone. The primary clinical outcome is 90-day mortality. Secondary clinical outcomes include 3-h, 6-h, and 24-h mortality; in-hospital mortality; 6-month mortality; length of stay (in hospital and intensive care unit); 24-h blood product use; need for haemorrhage control procedure (operation or angioembolisation); and time to commencement of haemorrhage control procedure (REBOA, operation, or angioembolisation). The primary economic outcome is lifetime incremental cost per QALY gained, from a health and personal social services perspective. DISCUSSION: This study, which is the first to randomly allocate patients to treatment with REBOA or standard care, will contribute high-level evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of REBOA in the management of trauma patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage and will provide important data on the feasibility of implementation of REBOA into mainstream clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16184981.